A view on the lakeshore
Photo: Irish Tourist Board
Lough Ree, which is about 25 km long
and 7 km wide, lies entirely on Carboniferous Limestone. While
it shows some evidence of being a solution lake such as undercut
rocks (1), the existence and orientation of the deep areas of
the lake are consistent with an origin by ice erosion
The lake has a very irregular shoreline
with extensive reed beds and an uneven bottom. There are many
sizeable islands particularly in the upper area. The greater
part of the lake is shallow and less than 6 m deep, however,
there are a number of deep trenches running in a north-south
direction with a maximum sounding of 35 m near the middle of
the lake. The catchment (Fig. 1) has a low population density.
The areas west and north of the lake have a population density
of less than 20 persons km-2 according to the 1981 census data.
There are five towns in the catchment with populations between
1000 and 5000 people but none are likely to have any effect on
the lake in terms of effluent discharge.
Agriculture is the main activity in the
catchment and there are extensive peat-mining activities just
north of the lake. The peat is used largely for the generation
of electricity. There are several small agri-industry plants
in the catchment and light and electronic engineering, chemical
and coal mining industries are significant employers.
Lough Ree is the second largest lake in
the River Shannon System after Lough Derg. It forms part of the
Shannon Navigation System and its development as an amenity and
recreational area for cruising is its principal beneficial use.
It is also renowned as a game and coarse fishery holding excellent
stocks of several species of coarse fish. The water supply for
Athlone (popul. 14,000), the principal town of the region, is
taken from the lake outlet, the River Shannon.
A detailed investigation of the water quality
of Lough Ree and its feeder streams was carried out in the period
1979-1981, with updates in 1984 and 1986 (Bowman, in prep.).
An initial assessment indicates that the lake was not significantly
affected by artificial eutrophication in the 1979 1981 period.
However, a light increase in the level of algal production was
noted in the subsequent examinations. The values recorded for
chlorophyll a and the total phosphorus concentrations place the
lake in the border between mesotrophic and eutrophic categories
according to the O.E.C.D. scheme (R).
Surface area [km2] | 105 |
Volume [km3] | 0.651 |
Maximum depth [m] | 35 |
Mean depth [m] | 6.2 |
Water level | Regulated |
Normal range of annual water level fluctuation [m] | 0.8 |
Residence time [yr] | 0.2 |
Catchment area [km2] | 4,530 |
D1 GEOGRAPHICAL
D2 CLIMATIC
Mean temp. [deg C] | ||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Ann. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 | 3.9 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 10.2 | 12.9 | 14.4 | 14 | 12.2 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 8.7 |
Precipitation [mm] | ||||||||||||
91 | 62 | 62 | 59 | 67 | 63 | 72 | 79 | 83 | 90 | 91 | 98 | 1,018 |
Fig. EUR-21-01
Bathymetric map [m].
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5* | - | 5.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 16.0 | 17.0 | 17.5 | 10.5 | - | - |
6 | - | 5.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 15.5 | 17.0 | 17.5 | 10.5 | - | - |
12 | - | 5.0 | 5.3 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 14.5 | 15.5 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 10.2 | - | - |
18 | - | 5.0 | 5.3 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 14.5 | 15.5 | 16.5 | 17.0 | 10.0 | - | - |
25 | - | 5.0 | 5.5 | 8.7 | 11.5 | 14.5 | 15.5 | 16 | 17.0 | 10.0 | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - | 11.2 | 14.5 | - | - | - | 10.0 | - | - |
30 | - | - | - | 8.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
* Surface. |
E1 TRANSPARENCY [m]
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | 2.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.3 | - | - |
E2 pH
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | - | 8.25 | 8.3 | 8.32 | 8.27 | 8.27 | 8.41 | 8.55 | 8.25 | 8.21 | - | - |
6 | - | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.32 | 8.27 | 8.27 | 8.39 | 8.53 | 8.26 | 8.29 | - | - |
12 | - | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.35 | 8.27 | 8.31 | 8.39 | 8.49 | 8.25 | 8.27 | - | - |
18 | - | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.35 | 8.27 | 8.30 | 8.42 | 8.52 | 8.25 | 8.23 | - | - |
24 | - | 8.3 | 8.4 | 8.32 | 8.15 | 8.29 | 8.34 | 8.52 | 8.26 | 8.21 | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - | 8.13 | 8.31 | - | - | - | 8.09 | - | - |
30 | - | - | - | 8.31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
E4 DO [mg l-1]
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | - | 9.5 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 10.2 | 9.7 | 10.8 | 11.2 | 9.4 | 10.0 | - | - |
6 | - | 9.5 | 9.9 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 11.0 | 9.4 | 10.0 | - | - |
12 | - | 9.3 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 11.0 | 9.4 | 9.8 | - | - |
18 | - | 9.4 | 9.9 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 9.4 | 10.2 | 10.8 | 9.3 | 9.6 | - | - |
24 | - | 9.4 | 9.9 | 9.7 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 10.8 | 9.0 | 9.7 | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - | 8.4 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 9.5 | - | - |
30 | - | - | - | 9.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
E6 CHLOROPHYLL CONCENTRATION [micro g l-1]
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | - | 2.53 | 2.9* | 5.89 | 0.34* | 2.0 | 6.68 | 15.66 | 2.8* | 7.0 | - | - |
6 | - | 2.2 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 6.78 | 14.41 | - | 7.3 | - | - | ||
12 | - | 1.66 | - | 4.26 | 0.82 | 0.6 | 6.94 | 12.95 | 2.3 | 7.0 | - | - |
18 | - | 2.2 | - | - | - | - | 7.20 | - | 1.7 | 6.9 | - | - |
24 | - | - | 6.63 | 5.89 | - | 0.9 | 5.50 | 14.95 | 3.1 | 6.8 | - | - |
* 0.5-6 m. |
E7 NITROGEN CONCENTRATION
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | - | 0.075 | 0.04 | 0.015 | 0.05 | 0.065 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.10 | 0.04 | - | - |
6 | - | 0.065 | 0.02 | 0.015 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.10 | 0.04 | - | - |
12 | - | 0.055 | 0.015 | 0.01 | 0.045 | 0.08 | 0.010 | 0.015 | 0.11 | 0.06 | - | - |
18 | - | 0.050 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.045 | 0.07 | 0.010 | 0.030 | 0.12 | 0.04 | - | - |
24 | - | 0.050 | 0.015 | 0.02 | 0.075 | 0.07 | 0.015 | 0.005 | 0.125 | 0.05 | - | - |
28 | - | - | - | - | 0.085 | 0.085 | - | - | - | 0.06 | - | - |
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | - | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.14 | - | - |
6 | - | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.075 | 0.22 | 0.14 | - | - |
12 | - | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.14 | - | - |
18 | - | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.14 | - | - |
24 | - | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.20 | - | - |
28 | - | - | - | - | 0.65 | 0.53 | - | - | - | 0.22 | - | - |
E8 PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION
Station 1, 1980 | ||||||||||||
Depth [m] | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | - | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.013 | 0.050 | 0.020 | 0.034 | 0.018 | 0.020 | - | - |
6 | - | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.033 | 0.015 | 0.030 | 0.021 | 0.034 | 0.023 | 0.046 | - | - |
12 | - | 0.028 | 0.025 | 0.038 | 0.013 | 0.023 | 0.019 | 0.036 | 0.016 | 0.021 | - | - |
18 | - | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.020 | 0.033 | 0.018 | 0.020 | - | - |
24 | - | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.035 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.020 | 0.031 | 0.019 | 0.024 | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - | 0.020 | 0.018 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
30 | - | - | - | 0.033 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
F1 FLORA
F2 FAUNA
F5 FISHERY PRODUCTS
G1 LAND USE IN THE CATCHMENT AREA
1980'S | ||
Area [km2] | [%] | |
---|---|---|
- Natural landscape | ||
Woody vegetation | 226 | 5 |
Herbaceous vegetation | 226 | 5 |
Peatland | 906 | 20 |
- Agricultural land | ||
Crop field | 226 | 5 |
Pasture land | 2,718 | 60 |
- Residential area | 45 | 1 |
- Others | 181 | 4 |
- Total | 4,528 | 100 |
G2 INDUSTRIES IN THE CATCHMENT AREA AND THE LAKE
H1 LAKE UTILIZATION
Source of water, navigation and transportation, sightseeing and tourism, recreation (swimming, sport-fishing, yachting) and fisheries.
H2 THE LAKE AS WATER RESOURCE
l980s | |
Use rate [m3 day-1] | |
---|---|
Domestic | 7,280 |
Industrial | 325 |
Power plant | 500,000 |
I1 ENHANCED SILTATION
I3 EUTROPHICATION
I4 ACIDIFICATION
J1 GENERATION OF POLLUTANTS IN THE CATCHMENT AREA
c) Limited pollution with wastewater treatment.
J2 APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POLLUTANT LOADS
[%]* | |
---|---|
Non-point sources | 95 |
Point sources | 4 |
Aeolian | 1 |
Total | 100 |
* Estimated. |
J3 SANITARY FACILITIES AND SEWERAGE
A draft water quality management plan for the Upper River Shannon System, including Lough Ree, was completed by An Foras Forbartha in 1986. It provides a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the water resource and identifies the many beneficial uses. Water quality standards and criteria are set out for the maintenance of satisfactory water qualities conditions and remedial measures are listed where necessary. The plan indicates actions necessary for the retention of satisfactory water conditions taking account of projected future development. The specific measures for Lough Ree include an inventory of the phosphorus inputs to the lake, both 'point' and 'non-point' and an assessment of the feasibility of restricting the input of waste-associated phosphorus to the lake. In regard to two smaller lakes (Loughs Coosan and Killinure) connected to the main lake by a narrow channel and known as the 'inner lakes', the policy of the plan is to prohibit any further increase of phosphorus input.
M1 NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS CONCERNED
M2 INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES
M3 RESEARCH INSTITUTES ENGAGED IN THE LAKE ENVIRONMENT STUDIES